--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-27 17:27 ---
Fixed then.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIR
--- Comment #5 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-27 16:20
---
Subject: Bug 37884
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Oct 27 16:19:25 2008
New Revision: 141383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141383
Log:
2008-10-27 Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-27 09:19 ---
Thanks for the fix. The ira-merge branch now bootstraps on s390 and s390x:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-10/msg01894.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-10/msg01879.html
--
http://gcc.gn
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-26 06:54 ---
Subject: Bug 37884
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Oct 26 06:53:25 2008
New Revision: 141371
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141371
Log:
2008-10-25 Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR middle-
--- Comment #2 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-10-24 22:21 ---
Andreas, thanks for the useful preliminary analysis. The problem is a bit
different than 37674. Loop4 contains Loop5 and there is an exit from Loop5
right to Loop1 and store (from hard reg in L5 to memory in L1) is rem
--- Comment #1 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 12:51 ---
The problem again (similar to PR37674) seems to be related to the
propagation of the hard reg conflict sets in ira_flattening. The
conflict sets are only propagated to the parent allocno if the child
allocno uses th
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37884
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37884
