--- Comment #16 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 15:55 ---
Subject: Bug 39937
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Apr 29 15:54:18 2009
New Revision: 146981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146981
Log:
2009-04-29 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 15:06
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 15:06
---
Subject: Bug 39937
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 29 15:05:22 2009
New Revision: 146973
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146973
Log:
2009-04-29 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/39937
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 14:55 ---
Subject: Bug 39937
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Apr 29 14:54:54 2009
New Revision: 146972
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146972
Log:
2009-04-29 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-04-29 14:12 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed
SPEC CPU 2006
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 14:10
> ---
> (I
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 14:10
---
(In reply to comment #10)
>
> 2009-04-28 Richard Guenther
>
> * tree-vect-loop.c (get_initial_def_for_induction): Use
> correct types for pointer increment.
>
That is before and with revisio
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-04-29 14:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Revision 146831 failed
SPEC CPU 2006
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 14:04
> ---
> On
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 14:06 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> On Linux/x86-64, I got
>
> gcc -c -o pp_sort.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -DPERL_CORE -O3 -ffast-math
> -funroll-loops -DSPEC_CPU_LP64 -DSPEC_CPU_LINUX_X64 pp_sort.c
> pp_sort.c: I
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 14:04 ---
On Linux/x86-64, I got
gcc -c -o pp_sort.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -DPERL_CORE -O3 -ffast-math
-funroll-loops -DSPEC_CPU_LP64 -DSPEC_CPU_LINUX_X64 pp_sort.c
pp_sort.c: In function 'S_qsortsv':
pp_sort.c:1
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 15:27 ---
Subject: Bug 39937
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 28 15:27:09 2009
New Revision: 146901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146901
Log:
2009-04-28 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/39937
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 14:11 ---
int foo (__const char *__restrict __s);
static void
read_anisou(char line[])
{
foo (line+1);
}
void
read_pdbfile(void)
{
char line[4096];
read_anisou (line);
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-28 13:36 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I have a patch for the gamess failure. What was the gromacs failure?
>
cc -c -o pdbio.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -ffast-math
-DSPEC_CPU_LP64 pdbio.c
pd
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 12:45 ---
I have a patch for the gamess failure. What was the gromacs failure?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39937
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 11:55 ---
SUBROUTINE DTREVC( SIDE, HOWMNY, SELECT, N, T, LDT, VL, LDVL, VR,
$ LDVR, MM, M, WORK, INFO )
DOUBLE PRECISION T( LDT, * ), VL( LDVL, * ), VR( LDVR, * ),
$
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-28 06:01 ---
Revision 146831:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-04/msg01473.html
is the cause.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
16 matches
Mail list logo
