[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

2010-03-25 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-25 15:15 --- The patch for the fix is: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=157286 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42130

[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

2010-03-08 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 17:54 --- Fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=157287 -- spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

2010-01-12 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 06:33 --- This seems to still be wrong code, so P1. -- spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

2009-12-23 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 17:37 --- The testcase still fails with -fgraphite-identity. -- spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

2009-12-15 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-15 08:21 --- I will add -fgraphite-identity to the testcase as otherwise we're not going to test graphite on trunk... diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/graphite/pr42130.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/graphite/pr42130.C index

[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

2009-12-15 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-15 08:27 --- Also, I don't know why the test fails at runtime like this: FAIL: g++.dg/graphite/pr42130.C execution test -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42130

[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

2009-11-30 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-30 16:59 --- Fixed. -- spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

2009-11-30 Thread grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-30 22:08 --- Subject: Bug 42130 Author: grosser Date: Mon Nov 30 22:07:59 2009 New Revision: 154849 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154849 Log: Protect loops that might be executed zero times. 2009-11-23

[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

2009-11-25 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-25 11:48 --- Tobias, Please fix the testcase before committing to trunk, like this ('return 0' is needed to ensure the test does not fail when compiled correctly; 'noclone' to ensure that foo is not specialized for n=0): /*

[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

2009-11-23 Thread grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-23 13:02 --- Subject: Bug 42130 Author: grosser Date: Mon Nov 23 13:02:08 2009 New Revision: 154440 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154440 Log: Protect loops that might be executed zero times. 2009-11-23

[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

2009-11-22 Thread grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-22 18:06 --- Created an attachment (id=19086) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19086action=view) First try - Needs cleanup I got a patch that fixes both the small C++ testcase and the dealII. It needs just

[Bug middle-end/42130] [graphite-branch] dealII fails

2009-11-21 Thread grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-21 08:50 --- Created an attachment (id=19071) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19071action=view) Small C++ testcase showing the same behavior -O2 -fno-tree-ch are required options Fails on execution