--- Comment #18 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 17:04 ---
Subject: Bug 42749
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Feb 23 17:02:26 2010
New Revision: 157010
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=157010
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline.
2010-02-23 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 12:02
---
I have a patch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 14:09
---
Subject: Bug 42749
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 22 14:09:26 2010
New Revision: 156960
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=156960
Log:
2010-02-22 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 15:46
---
*** Bug 42923 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 15:44
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42749
--- Comment #13 from bero at arklinux dot org 2010-01-21 11:56 ---
FWIW a very similar error occurs when building mysql 5.5.1-m2, almost certainly
the same bug
opt_range.cc: In member function 'int SEL_ARG::store_min_key(KEY_PART*,
uchar**, uint*, uint)':
opt_range.cc:11812:42: error:
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-16 10:35 ---
Indeed it's harder that I thought originally as well ;) I wonder why we
re-create a simple form of the return value adjustment instead of just copying
the existing statements.
--
--
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #10 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-16 12:53
---
/* Reject a tailcall if the type conversion might need
285 additional code. */
286if (gimple_assign_cast_p (stmt)
287 TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-01-16 13:19 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] -O2 and verify_stmts
failed again
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #10 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-16 12:53
---
/*
--- Comment #12 from rakdver at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz 2010-01-16
13:24 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] -O2 and verify_stmts
failed again
--- Comment #10 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-16 12:53
---
/* Reject a tailcall if the type
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-16 06:21 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
It is caused by revision 146831:
Exposed by, not really caused in this case. The bug was there before the extra
checking was added. I am looking into fixing tailr. Note we do go from an
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-16 06:43 ---
This is harder than I thought. CCing the original author of this part of the
code.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
14 matches
Mail list logo
