[Bug middle-end/44989] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/guality/redeclaration1.C

2010-07-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-23 12:56 ---
Confirmed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-07-23 12:56:35
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44989

[Bug middle-end/44989] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/guality/redeclaration1.C

2010-07-19 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2010-07-19 13:42 ---
Revision 162269 is bad and revision 162264 is good.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44989

[Bug middle-end/44989] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/guality/redeclaration1.C

2010-07-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44989

[Bug middle-end/44989] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/guality/redeclaration1.C

2010-07-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-19 16:32 ---
The test is new, how could this be a regression?
Yes, -flto/-fwhopr has lots of issues with debug info.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44989