https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47048
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47048
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-07-29
01:54:25 UTC ---
Checking the failures in vect.exp at r176905 with -fgraphite-identity enabled
at -O2, we seem to have picked up a bunch for -flto at -m32 on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47048
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-02-07
12:29:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
More specifically, the code that is now confused by the (int) cast is:
dr_analyze_innermost (dr);
dr_analyze_indices
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47048
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-02-01
20:20:28 UTC ---
With the patches proposed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40979#c14 and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40979#c17 and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47048
Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47048
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-01 23:28:33
UTC ---
I think that the problem is (again) the type of the induction variables that we
create in graphite: in pr33866.c we have
D.2720_37 = (int)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47048
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-01 23:32:20
UTC ---
More specifically, the code that is now confused by the (int) cast is:
dr_analyze_innermost (dr);
dr_analyze_indices (dr, nest, loop);
in create_data_ref.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47048
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-02-02 07:42:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
More specifically, the code that is now confused by the (int) cast
There might be overlap with PR47341 (also casts
