http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-06
13:19:08 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jul 6 13:19:04 2011
New Revision: 175912
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175912
Log:
Use pointer_mode for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #16 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-06
20:30:13 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jul 6 20:30:06 2011
New Revision: 175933
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175933
Log:
Use pointer_mode for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-12
17:36:47 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Feb 12 17:36:45 2011
New Revision: 170080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170080
Log:
Support 32bit address
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-12
17:37:49 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Feb 12 17:37:46 2011
New Revision: 170081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170081
Log:
Use ptr_mode instead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-09
17:20:07 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Feb 9 17:20:00 2011
New Revision: 169979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169979
Log:
Disable ivopts for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-04 04:12:59
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
looks wrong since it assumes D.2750_34 can be negative. But
sizetype values are sign-extended.
ivopts uses unsigned on purpose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2011-01-21 11:43:45 UTC ---
Sent from my Palm Pre on ATamp;T
On Jan 20, 2011 21:34, hjl.tools at gmail dot com
lt;gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.orggt; wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-21
12:38:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Sent from my Palm Pre on ATamp;T
On Jan 20, 2011 21:34, hjl.tools at gmail dot com
lt;gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.orggt; wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-21 05:33:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The ivopts pass transforms
unsigned int D.2715;
unsigned int D.2716;
...
D.2715_43 = (unsigned int) elems_3(D);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-21 05:52:47
UTC ---
Should ivopts use signed integer instead of unsigned integer
for index type if it is known to be negative?
14 matches
Mail list logo