[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-14 Thread tema at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #9 from Artem Shinkarov tema at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-14 15:39:56 UTC --- The problem should be fixed with 179991. Anyone running 32-bit architectures, please confirm.

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-12 Thread tema at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 Artem Shinkarov tema at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tema at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-10-12 17:01:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) Ah! It happens because the underlying architecture is 32-bit. We should run these tests only on 64-bit

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-10-12 17:00:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Ah! It happens because the underlying architecture is 32-bit. We should run these tests only on 64-bit architectures to get the correct

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-12 Thread tema at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #5 from Artem Shinkarov tema at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 17:03:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) Ah! It happens because the underlying architecture is 32-bit. We should

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-10-12 17:36:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) So if I want to run the test only on 64-bit architectures, then lp64 is the correct choice in dg-require-effective-target? Artem.

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-12 Thread tema at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #7 from Artem Shinkarov tema at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 17:45:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) So if I want to run the test only on 64-bit architectures, then lp64 is the correct choice in

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

2011-10-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-10-12 17:58:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) I need to make sure that UNITS_PER_WORD is 8 on the architecture I am running the test. Is it the case for x32? Yes.