https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-24
08:57:12 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 24 08:57:08 2012
New Revision: 191658
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191658
Log:
2012-09-24 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-21
13:27:30 UTC ---
We have broken immediate uses of .MEM_2 (for example). Before update-ssa:
main ()
{
int a.1;
int a.0;
int i;
:
:
# i_10 = PHI <0(2)>
# .MEM_11 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-21
12:39:19 UTC ---
Simpler testcase from PR54646, fails at -O2:
int a;
int main()
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 1; ++i)
__transaction_atomic { ++a; }
return 0;
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||srdjan.stipic at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-20
15:08:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > After loop unrolling the above remains unchanged, but the following is
> > insert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-09-20 07:43:56 UTC ---
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
>
> Aldy Hernandez changed:
>
>What
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-14
21:20:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 28195
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28195
reduced testcase
Further reduced testcase that triggers on either C/C++.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-12
19:52:55 UTC ---
I'll take a look.
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-12
19:53:30 UTC ---
I'll take a look.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-12
19:52:55 UTC ---
I'll take a look.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #5 from John Regehr 2012-02-15 03:58:22
UTC ---
Sorry, see PR52255
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-15
03:53:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Smaller testcase in pure C for apparently the same problem.
This is a different issue, Can you file a bug report about this one?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
John Regehr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||regehr at cs dot utah.edu
--- Comment #3 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Jack Lloyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26615|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #1 from Jack Lloyd 2012-02-08 15:52:19
UTC ---
Created attachment 26615
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26615
Testcase
22 matches
Mail list logo
