http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #21 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-20
18:16:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > Assuming fixed.
>
> Well yes! Maybe we should clear the issue on who's supposed to close PR's
> after a fix?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #20 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-20
15:26:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Assuming fixed.
Well yes! Maybe we should clear the issue on who's supposed to close PR's
after a fix? I'd be happy to do it for PR's I've
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #18 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-10-10
10:25:13 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Oct 10 10:25:03 2012
New Revision: 192301
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192301
Log:
PR middle-end/54860 - Make sure attrib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-10-09
22:02:22 UTC ---
To be absolutely clear: I don't really care about the new errors, it was just
appropriate to mention them. Don't let any investigation hold up your
break-fixing commit...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-10-09
21:57:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 28407
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28407
Excerpt from g++.log with the mentioned new errors
I would have attached the whole of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #15 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-10-09 21:33:00 UTC ---
> --- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-10-09
> 20:43:11 UTC ---
>
> The patch fixes the problem for cris-elf with no regressions in test-suite
> results.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #14 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-10-09 21:28:44 UTC ---
I have submitted the patch to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg00914.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-10-09
20:43:11 UTC ---
The patch fixes the problem for cris-elf with no regressions in test-suite
results. Thanks!
But, the new tests introduce some new failures:
+g++.sum g++.dg/cpp0x/gen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak 2012-10-09 18:40:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I can confirm that the patch fixes the sparc bootstrap.
Also alpha bootstrap.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #11 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 17:12:25 UTC ---
I can confirm that the patch fixes the sparc bootstrap.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
davem at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davem at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #9 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-10-09
14:52:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 28400
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28400
Candidate fix patch
Guys, could you please test this patch on your trees to see if it fixe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #8 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-10-09 14:08:20 UTC ---
I can reproduce it now. I guess I shouldn't look at bugs around
midnight or something.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8 Regression]: build |[4.8 Regression]: build
15 matches
Mail list logo