[Bug middle-end/55545] [4.8 Regression] Incredibly large compile-time performance regression on IA64 compiling 253.perlbmk

2012-12-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/55545] [4.8 Regression] Incredibly large compile-time performance regression on IA64 compiling 253.perlbmk

2012-12-04 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/55545] [4.8 Regression] Incredibly large compile-time performance regression on IA64 compiling 253.perlbmk

2012-12-04 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-12-04 09:00:29 UTC --- On Mon, 3 Dec 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545 > > Eric Botcazou changed: > >What

[Bug middle-end/55545] [4.8 Regression] Incredibly large compile-time performance regression on IA64 compiling 253.perlbmk

2012-12-03 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||55158 --- Comment #7 from Eric

[Bug middle-end/55545] [4.8 Regression] Incredibly large compile-time performance regression on IA64 compiling 253.perlbmk

2012-12-03 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-03 08:42:51 UTC --- > The last time I built and tested the compiler on IA-64, the C testsuite > results > were rather bad, especially at -O3. I just retried and there are still a bunch of C/C++/

[Bug middle-end/55545] [4.8 Regression] Incredibly large compile-time performance regression on IA64 compiling 253.perlbmk

2012-11-30 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/55545] [4.8 Regression] Incredibly large compile-time performance regression on IA64 compiling 253.perlbmk

2012-11-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2012-11-30 13:16:36 UTC --- Oh, and 1080x seems to be what ulimit -t is for these jobs - thus this are endless loops.

[Bug middle-end/55545] [4.8 Regression] Incredibly large compile-time performance regression on IA64 compiling 253.perlbmk

2012-11-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2012-11-30 13:15:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > It seems to be compiling build-disjuncts.c btw. which is from 197.parser - where the compiler currently is after two hours (but in schedule_block

[Bug middle-end/55545] [4.8 Regression] Incredibly large compile-time performance regression on IA64 compiling 253.perlbmk

2012-11-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2012-11-30 13:11:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Do you also have revision numbers in those logs? Unfortunately not, but I can see that rev. 193357 was definitely ok and rev. 193534 definitely br

[Bug middle-end/55545] [4.8 Regression] Incredibly large compile-time performance regression on IA64 compiling 253.perlbmk

2012-11-30 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545 --- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-30 13:00:46 UTC --- Do you also have revision numbers in those logs?

[Bug middle-end/55545] [4.8 Regression] Incredibly large compile-time performance regression on IA64 compiling 253.perlbmk

2012-11-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0