[Bug middle-end/56077] [4.6/4.7 Regression] volatile ignored when function inlined

2013-04-11 Thread abel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 --- Comment #16 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-11 06:17:41 UTC --- The patch adds more pending list flushes and thus more dependencies. So by itself it is conservative and should not result in correctness issues

[Bug middle-end/56077] [4.6/4.7 Regression] volatile ignored when function inlined

2013-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-11 00:38:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) The fix has been reverted on the 4.6 and 4.7 branches. I think it should also be reverted on the 4.8 branch, see PR

[Bug middle-end/56077] [4.6/4.7 Regression] volatile ignored when function inlined

2013-04-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-11 05:37:30 UTC --- No, it shouldn't be reverted, silent wrong code is IMHO more severe than LTO only ICE.

[Bug middle-end/56077] [4.6/4.7 Regression] volatile ignored when function inlined

2013-04-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/56077] [4.6/4.7 Regression] volatile ignored when function inlined

2013-04-02 Thread abel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/56077] [4.6/4.7 Regression] volatile ignored when function inlined

2013-02-25 Thread abel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW