http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61010
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61010
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Indeed we iterate in /* Canonicalize (X C1) | C2. */ because we fold
(unsigned int) (a * 64) 255
to
(unsigned int) (a * 64) 192
in /* Fold (X * CST1) CST2 to zero if we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61010
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61010
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61010
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Like
Index: gcc/fold-const.c
===
--- gcc/fold-const.c(revision 209928)
+++ gcc/fold-const.c(working copy)
@@