https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 6 08:09:40 2016
New Revision: 234775
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234775=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-04-06 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
--- Comment #8 from Dominik Vogt ---
Successfully bootstrapped and regression tested on s390x (biarch).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 1 15:58:25 2016
New Revision: 233856
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233856=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-03-01 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
comment #2 (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> So we fail analyzing the loop nest because a) the loop header check of the
> inner
> loop makes it conditionally executed, b) we have outer loop IV
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
Dominik Vogt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
So we fail analyzing the loop nest because a) the loop header check of the
inner
loop makes it conditionally executed, b) we have outer loop IV computes i+-1
guarded by that check.
For a/b) it would be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
10 matches
Mail list logo