https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Jan 26 23:07:02 2017
New Revision: 244956
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244956=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78703 - fprintf-return-value floating point handling incorrect in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Jan 26 21:14:18 2017
New Revision: 244953
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244953=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78703 -fprintf-return-value floating point handling incorrect in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Jan 24 01:10:10 2017
New Revision: 244847
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244847=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78703 - -fprintf-return-value floating point handling incorrect
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Jan 24 01:06:34 2017
New Revision: 244846
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244846=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78703 - -fprintf-return-value floating point handling incorrect
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Jan 24 00:55:19 2017
New Revision: 244845
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244845=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78703 - -fprintf-return-value floating point handling incorrect
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
I agree. It's hard to strike a balance between false positives and false
negatives.
FYI: The pass tracks three byte counters for every sprintf call: exact (for
values we know are exact), minimum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For -fprintf-return-value, it is desirable to count with the worst case, but
I'm not sure it is the right behavior for the warning. If we are aware of just
1 and 2 byte decimal points in the wild, forcing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
11 matches
Mail list logo