[Bug middle-end/84067] [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 27 13:23:15 2018 New Revision: 258881 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258881=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-27 Richard Biener PR middle-ed/84067

[Bug middle-end/84067] [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/84067] [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/84067] [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 --- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7) > On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 > > > > --- Comment #6 from

[Bug middle-end/84067] [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 > > --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to

[Bug middle-end/84067] [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5) > On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 > > > > --- Comment #3 from

[Bug middle-end/84067] [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 > > --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/84067] [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > So any hint on whether the code after r257077 is better or worse than > > before? > > Looks worse

[Bug middle-end/84067] [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > So any hint on whether the code after r257077 is better or worse than before? Looks worse unfortunately: For aarch64 at -O2 it generates: foo:

[Bug middle-end/84067] [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/84067] [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|