[Bug middle-end/84834] [7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have complex_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5527

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84834

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Fixed for 7.4+ too.

[Bug middle-end/84834] [7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have complex_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5527

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84834

--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 22 20:38:25 2018
New Revision: 261921

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261921=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-03-13  Jakub Jelinek  

PR middle-end/84834
* match.pd ((A & C) != 0 ? D : 0): Use INTEGER_CST@2 instead of
integer_pow2p@2 and test integer_pow2p in condition.
(A < 0 ? C : 0): Similarly for @1.

* gcc.dg/pr84834.c: New test.

Added:
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr84834.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/match.pd
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug middle-end/84834] [7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have complex_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5527

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84834

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE: tree  |[7 Regression] ICE: tree
   |check: expected |check: expected
   |integer_cst, have   |integer_cst, have
   |complex_cst in to_wide, at  |complex_cst in to_wide, at
   |tree.h:5527 |tree.h:5527

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Fixed for 8.1+ so far.