https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #11 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jozefl
Date: Sat Nov 17 00:45:43 2018
New Revision: 266230
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266230=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-17 Jozef Lawrynowicz
PR middle-end/87854
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #8)
> So just want to make sure that it is ok that this assumption can no longer
> be made.
Yes. The string is just too large for the target.
> I'll then add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 16 16:41:54 2018
New Revision: 266217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266217=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/87854
* c-common.c (fix_string_type): Reject string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #8 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> For some yes. I assume not e.g. for nvptx as it has 64-bit size_t but can't
> compile it for other reasons.
Ok, I'll make sure to check that.
The new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For some yes. I assume not e.g. for nvptx as it has 64-bit size_t but can't
compile it for other reasons.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #6 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Yeah, that is the goal. And you should either add msp430-*-* to dg-skip-if,
> or do we have some effective targets for all targets with 16-bit size_t (or
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, that is the goal. And you should either add msp430-*-* to dg-skip-if, or
do we have some effective targets for all targets with 16-bit size_t (or
perhaps < 32-bit), so that we could skip them all at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #4 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Thanks, the patch fixes the ICE on msp430-elf and the test now outputs:
> gcc.c-torture/compile/pr46534.c:17:3: error: size of string literal is too
> large
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #0)
> Rather than ICE'ing should there be some error message about object size
> being too large?
Yes. In any case, there should be no ICE whatever code you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||msp430, avr
CC|
13 matches
Mail list logo
