https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> Is there some critical use of this that we would want to have for GCC 9?
I don't think making it work as I suggested is critical for GCC 9 in comment
#0. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Yep, GCC considers attributes to be part of the definition of a function for
> IPA passes. We are not consitent here (i.e. warning attributes on aliases
> counts), so it makes sense to support this (and is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.1.0, 8.2.0, 9.0
--- Comment #1 from
