https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94035
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, ch3root at openwall dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94035
>
> --- Comment #5 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
> I see. But the problem with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94035
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
I see. But the problem with decimal floating-point formats remains...
Based on bug 93806, comment 41, here is an example with equal but different
values:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94035
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, ch3root at openwall dot com wrote:
> What about IBM extended double (double-double)? All cases where (double)(hi +
> lo) != hi are trap representations too?
I think so.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94035
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #2)
> I think pseudo-denormals should be considered trap representations.
Cool!
What about IBM extended double (double-double)? All cases where
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94035
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I think pseudo-denormals should be considered trap representations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94035
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
clang bug -- https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45101
