[Bug other/69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein

2018-09-14 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Sep 14 22:02:58 2018 New Revision: 264335 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264335=gcc=rev Log: Fix overeager spelling corrections (PR c/82967) This patch tunes class

[Bug other/69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein

2018-06-12 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein

2018-06-12 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Tue Jun 12 18:28:37 2018 New Revision: 261521 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261521=gcc=rev Log: spellcheck: support transpositions aka Damerau-Levenshtein (PR other/69968)

[Bug other/69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein

2018-04-30 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug other/69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein

2016-11-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target Milestone|7.0

[Bug other/69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein

2016-02-26 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2) Gah; I had typos in some of these; fixing them inline below (I hope): > With Damerau-Levenshtein, we'd have (I think): > > coorzd1 -> coordz1

[Bug other/69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein

2016-02-26 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > but the distance from coorzd1 to coordz1 should be 2 one deletion and one > insertion. Why's that not found? I think the distance given in the initial comment

[Bug other/69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein

2016-02-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- but the distance from coorzd1 to coordz1 should be 2 one deletion and one insertion. Why's that not found?

[Bug other/69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein

2016-02-25 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0