https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103355
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46d3cfd29dc701e1e0d18b0380d6299fce7944f2
commit r12-5472-g46d3cfd29dc701e1e0d18b0380d6299fce7944f2
Author: Christophe Lyon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103355
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103355
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:630686f93f0018fa1ef128aa673fddd302cc83e1
commit r12-5459-g630686f93f0018fa1ef128aa673fddd302cc83e1
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103355
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Mine, but I'll just use Jon's patch.
That's a reasonable solution for me ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103355
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103355
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103355
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The question becomes unknown attributes don't do anything right? If so the
warning on an attribute like this seems over the top.