--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10
10:37 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00410.html is a start.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19309
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10
13:13 ---
.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10
13:14 ---
Subject: Bug 19309
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-10 13:14:03
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/doc:
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19309
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07
14:00 ---
I don't know if this an excepted change, but either way the documention does
not match reality.
Oh, in 3.3.2 we did predefined those macros which is why this is a regression.
--
What
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-01-07
21:44 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong documentation of predefined __GNUC__
with cpp invocation
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot