[Bug preprocessor/19309] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong documentation of predefined __GNUC__ with cpp invocation

2005-02-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10 10:37 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00410.html is a start. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19309

[Bug preprocessor/19309] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong documentation of predefined __GNUC__ with cpp invocation

2005-02-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10 13:13 --- . -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/19309] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong documentation of predefined __GNUC__ with cpp invocation

2005-02-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10 13:14 --- Subject: Bug 19309 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-10 13:14:03 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/doc:

[Bug preprocessor/19309] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong documentation of predefined __GNUC__ with cpp invocation

2005-02-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.4 |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19309

[Bug preprocessor/19309] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong documentation of predefined __GNUC__ with cpp invocation

2005-01-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07 14:00 --- I don't know if this an excepted change, but either way the documention does not match reality. Oh, in 3.3.2 we did predefined those macros which is why this is a regression. -- What

[Bug preprocessor/19309] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong documentation of predefined __GNUC__ with cpp invocation

2005-01-07 Thread neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-01-07 21:44 --- Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong documentation of predefined __GNUC__ with cpp invocation pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:- --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot