https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #32 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddb7f0a0cac48762ba6408d69538f8115c4a2739
commit r13-3264-gddb7f0a0cac48762ba6408d69538f8115c4a2739
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpy00 at outlook dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #30 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #29)
> I posted this question on g...@gcc.gnu.org and got not response so I thought
> I would ask here on the bug report.
>
> I am trying to understand the status of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Bug 60723 depends on bug 61817, which changed state.
Bug 61817 Summary: Inconsistent location of tokens in the expansion list of a
built-in macro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61817
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If this is about ccache, I wonder if ccache couldn't preprocess with
-fdirectives-only instead, that way hopefully no info is lost.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #25 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #24)
(In reply to Dodji Seketeli from comment #22)
So finally the two patches that have been proposed at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #20 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In a function-like macro expansion, regular tokens are line-marked as being
expanded at the opening parenthesis, while builtins are line-marked as being
expanded at the closing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #21 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Jul 16 10:33:36 2014
New Revision: 212638
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212638root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/60723 - missing system-ness marks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #22 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So finally the two patches that have been proposed at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01063.html and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01064.html have been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #23 from Nicholas nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61817
The more I talk, the more work you seem to have. :p
Thank you for taking this.
Cheers,
Nicholas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #19 from christophe.lyon at st dot com ---
As discussed on IRC, I could test your patch, and the compiler now builds
successfully.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33010|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #18 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks Christophe,
The attached patch above should hopefully fix the issue it was causing. Is
there a chance that you test that it doesn't break your arm build before I try
to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #13 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dodji
Date: Tue Jul 1 09:17:14 2014
New Revision: 212194
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212194root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/60723 - missing system-ness marks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
christophe.lyon at st dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophe.lyon at st dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #15 from christophe.lyon at st dot com ---
Created attachment 33039
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33039action=edit
preprocessed input
This preprocessed input (-E) shows how commit 212194 is broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #16 from christophe.lyon at st dot com ---
Created attachment 33040
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33040action=edit
preprocessed input
This preprocessed input (-E -dD) shows how commit 212194 is broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #12 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33010
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33010action=edit
A patch candidate that I am currently testing
This the patch I am running through
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #9 from Nicholas nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com ---
Manuel, I have filed a patch to gcc-patches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00862.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #7 from Nicholas nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com ---
What a pleasant surprise to see your name, Matt.
This dropped off my radar for a bit, but I'm pretty close now to getting a
properly organized patch ready. Details to follow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #8 from Matt Godbolt matt at godbolt dot org ---
Thanks Nicholas :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Matt Godbolt matt at godbolt dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at godbolt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Nicholas nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #1 from Nicholas nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com ---
The preprocessor emits line directives with the system-header flag when using
complicated macros. This causes certain warnings, like -Wswitch and -Wreorder,
to be suppressed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #2 from Nicholas nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 32504
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32504action=edit
Repro header
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #3 from Nicholas nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 32505
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32505action=edit
Repro source
33 matches
Mail list logo
