[Bug rtl-optimization/105936] [10 Regression] ICE with inline-asm and TLS on x86_64 and -O2 in move_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105936 Stas Sergeev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Stas Sergeev

[Bug rtl-optimization/105936] [10 Regression] ICE with inline-asm and TLS on x86_64 and -O2 in move_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105936 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/105936] [10 Regression] ICE with inline-asm and TLS on x86_64 and -O2 in move_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105936 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- Digging a bit further with current gcc-10 branch... Instrumenting a TLS address splitter in i386.md with some creative printfs: (define_split [(match_operand 0 "tls_address_pattern")]

[Bug rtl-optimization/105936] [10 Regression] ICE with inline-asm and TLS on x86_64 and -O2 in move_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105936 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- For some reason, split1 pass converts (insn): (insn 54 51 109 9 (parallel [ (asm_operands/v ("btrl %1,%0") ("") 0 [ (mem/c:BLK (plus:DI (plus:DI (unspec:DI [

[Bug rtl-optimization/105936] [10 Regression] ICE with inline-asm and TLS on x86_64 and -O2 in move_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105936 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-reduction --- Comment #2 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/105936] [10 Regression] ICE with inline-asm and TLS on x86_64 and -O2 in move_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105936 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-reduction |inline-asm Summary|[10