https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e9279fadbd1c673c875b9d20261d2de0473f63f
commit r14-5542-g9e9279fadbd1c673c875b9d20261d2de0473f63f
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #19 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #18)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #17)
> > Works for me. Will you send the simplify_gen_unary ->
> > simplify_unary_operation change to gcc-patches?
>
> I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #17)
> Works for me. Will you send the simplify_gen_unary ->
> simplify_unary_operation change to gcc-patches?
I don't have a platform where it makes a difference to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #17 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #16)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12)
> > What about this patch:
> > ```
> > diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc b/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
> > index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #16 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12)
> What about this patch:
> ```
> diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc b/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
> index 69d87579d9c..f3745d86aea 100644
> --- a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
> +++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|tamar.christina at arm dot com |
--- Comment #15 from Tamar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|xry111 at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ba7529ee3974667a8e68d089b606ac2fb159415
commit r14-5377-g7ba7529ee3974667a8e68d089b606ac2fb159415
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Sun Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
What about this patch:
```
diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc b/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
index 69d87579d9c..f3745d86aea 100644
--- a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
+++ b/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
@@ -4392,7 +4392,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #11 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |xry111 at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #9 from Xi Ruoyao ---
*** Bug 112484 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #7)
> Yeah, that fold-rtx code is bogus. It's a latent bug.
>
> Optimizing copysign(x, -y) to neg(x) is just wrong.
>
> Will you be sending a patch Xi or do you want
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|loongarch64-linux-gnu |loongarch64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #5 from Xi
19 matches
Mail list logo
