[Bug rtl-optimization/25115] [4.2 Regression] Segmentation fault in pre_insert_copy_insn

2005-12-20 Thread bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-12-20 17:06 --- Subject: Bug 25115 Author: bonzini Date: Tue Dec 20 17:06:14 2005 New Revision: 108855 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108855 Log: 2005-12-20 Roger Sayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paolo Bonzini

[Bug rtl-optimization/25115] [4.2 Regression] Segmentation fault in pre_insert_copy_insn

2005-12-20 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-12-20 17:22 --- patch committed -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/25115] [4.2 Regression] Segmentation fault in pre_insert_copy_insn

2005-12-17 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-12-17 13:31 --- Created an attachment (id=10518) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10518action=view) patch suggested by Roger This patch uses the approach, suggested by Roger Sayle on gcc-patches, to Look for look for a

[Bug rtl-optimization/25115] [4.2 Regression] Segmentation fault in pre_insert_copy_insn

2005-12-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-09 03:50 --- I see this on cris-axis-elf too, with local changes in progress of changing from cc0, causing at least: Running /home/hp/combined/combined/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/builtins.exp ... FAIL:

[Bug rtl-optimization/25115] [4.2 Regression] Segmentation fault in pre_insert_copy_insn

2005-12-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-01 15:53 --- Assigning to bonzini by request. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/25115] [4.2 Regression] Segmentation fault in pre_insert_copy_insn

2005-11-28 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-11-28 10:53 --- Created an attachment (id=10352) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10352action=view) patch to fix the bug Kaz, can you please test this patch? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25115

[Bug rtl-optimization/25115] [4.2 Regression] Segmentation fault in pre_insert_copy_insn

2005-11-28 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 12:30 --- It fixes the ICE and produces better codes. Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25115

[Bug rtl-optimization/25115] [4.2 Regression] Segmentation fault in pre_insert_copy_insn

2005-11-28 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Comment #4 from giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-11-28 13:01 --- Out of curiosity, can you show the code before and after Paolo's patches? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25115

[Bug rtl-optimization/25115] [4.2 Regression] Segmentation fault in pre_insert_copy_insn

2005-11-28 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 13:33 --- Argh. I've got the results other way around. Before patch: -- .global foo .type foo, @function foo: mov.l r12,@-r15 mov.l r14,@-r15 mov r15,r14 mov.l

[Bug rtl-optimization/25115] [4.2 Regression] Segmentation fault in pre_insert_copy_insn

2005-11-28 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 15:34 --- Created an attachment (id=10354) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10354action=view) Testcase which failes on S/390 64bit with -O2 This testcase is reduced from gengtype-lex.c. Due to this bug it

[Bug rtl-optimization/25115] [4.2 Regression] Segmentation fault in pre_insert_copy_insn

2005-11-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 04:57 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added