--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 14:00 ---
Subject: Bug 33669
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 9 14:00:11 2007
New Revision: 129166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129166
Log:
gcc/
2007-10-09 Kenneth Zadeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #14 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-09 15:32
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128957
miscompiles 481.wrf
hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 14:00 ---
Subject: Bug 33669
Author:
--- Comment #15 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-09 15:41
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128957
miscompiles 481.wrf
This patch fixes the problem in a slightly different way. The other
patch was too conservative in that it ended up setting the added flag
too
--- Comment #16 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-09 16:19 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128957
miscompiles 481.wrf
please back this out. i have a different patch that i have finished
testing. this one is too conservative.
I backed
--- Comment #17 from zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 03:32 ---
Subject: Bug 33669
Author: zadeck
Date: Wed Oct 10 03:32:43 2007
New Revision: 129193
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129193
Log:
2007-10-07 Kenneth Zadeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #18 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-10 03:39
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128957
miscompiles 481.wrf
HJ,
Sorry about the committing snafu. I should have posted the irc log of
seonbae's comments to the log for the bug. Also I had a meeting
--- Comment #19 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-10 03:41
---
patch committed to fix this.
--
zadeck at naturalbridge dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #20 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-10 03:47 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128957
miscompiles 481.wrf
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:39:48PM -0400, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
HJ,
Sorry about the committing snafu. I should have posted the irc log of
--- Comment #12 from seongbae dot park at gmail dot com 2007-10-08 20:18
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128957 miscompiles 481.wrf
Please remove the extra blank line above the line 984 (in new file).
This patch is OK.
Seongbae
On 10/7/07, Kenneth Zadeck [EMAIL
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--
zadeck at naturalbridge dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |zadeck at naturalbridge dot
|dot org
--- Comment #10 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-07 21:57
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128957
miscompiles 481.wrf
This patch fixes pr33669.
The failure only happens if you have a block with 2 or more uses of a
multiword pseudo register that is local to
--- Comment #11 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-08 03:53
---
*** Bug 33662 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
zadeck at naturalbridge dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-06 16:16 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128957
miscompiles 481.wrf
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-06 02:07 ---
Kenny, does your patch
--- Comment #9 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-07 03:18
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128957
miscompiles 481.wrf
hj,
here is a fix. I will most likely post the patch on monday after i get
it really tested on a bunch of platforms. The fix is in the third
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-05 21:17 ---
netcdf/posixio.c is miscompiled.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33669
--- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-05 21:49 ---
px_get in netcdf/posixio.c is miscompiled at -O2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33669
--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-05 21:52 ---
px_get in netcdf/posixio.c is miscompiled at -O1 and -O0 is OK.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33669
--- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-05 23:14 ---
#include string.h
#include stdlib.h
typedef struct foo_t {
size_t blksz;
size_t bf_extent;
size_t bf_cnt;
void*bf_base;
} foo_t;
#define _RNDUP(x, unit) x) + (unit) - 1)
--- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-06 02:07 ---
Kenny, does your patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00124.html
handle cases where number of consecutive hard regs needed to hold some mode 1
correctly? IA32 needs 2 hard registers to hold long long and your
--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-06 02:31 ---
A smaller testcase:
bash-3.2$ cat x.c
extern void abort (void);
typedef struct foo_t
{
unsigned int blksz;
unsigned int bf_cnt;
} foo_t;
#define _RNDUP(x, unit) x) + (unit) - 1) / (unit)) * (unit))
#define
--- Comment #7 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-10-06 04:11
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128957
miscompiles 481.wrf
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-06 02:07 ---
Kenny, does your patch
23 matches
Mail list logo
