[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] [4.8 Regression] LRA doesn't scale

2012-10-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-26 23:03:05 UTC --- -fno-ira-share-spill-slots doesn't make a difference.

[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] [4.8 Regression] LRA doesn't scale

2012-10-26 Thread vmakarov at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-26 22:57:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > LRA reuses stack memory much better than reload (in all modes but especially > in -O0). May be that is the reason of the var-tracking problem.

[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] [4.8 Regression] LRA doesn't scale

2012-10-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-26 22:56:55 UTC --- The testcase is compiled with -O2, not -O0.

[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] [4.8 Regression] LRA doesn't scale

2012-10-26 Thread vmakarov at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-26 22:49:23 UTC --- LRA reuses stack memory much better than reload (in all modes but especially in -O0). May be that is the reason of the var-tracking problem.

[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] [4.8 Regression] LRA doesn't scale

2012-10-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co