subject:"\[Bug rtl\-optimization\/81747\] \[8 Regression\] ICE in operator\[\], at vec.h\:749"

[Bug rtl-optimization/81747] [8 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:749

2017-09-13 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81747 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 17:28:54 2017 New Revision: 252573 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252573&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR81747, ICE in operator[] PR rtl-optimization/81747 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/81747] [8 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:749

2017-08-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81747 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/81747] [8 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:749

2017-08-25 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81747 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Fri Aug 25 12:21:00 2017 New Revision: 251349 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251349&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR81747, ICE in operator[] PR rtl-optimization/81747 * cse.

[Bug rtl-optimization/81747] [8 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:749

2017-08-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81747 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at g

[Bug rtl-optimization/81747] [8 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:749

2017-08-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81747 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- Yeah, I have more or less the same patch about to be bootstrapped.

[Bug rtl-optimization/81747] [8 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:749

2017-08-08 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81747 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- Yeah, I found out it is _not_ the one the backtrace (or GDB) points at. I have a patch: === diff --git a/gcc/cse.c b/gcc/cse.c index 6a968d1..34650d2 100644 --- a/gcc/cse.c +++ b/gcc/cse.c @@ -6642,6 +

[Bug rtl-optimization/81747] [8 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:749

2017-08-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81747 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- Segher, the confusion is due to looking at the wrong BRANCH_EDGE occurrence in cse.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/81747] [8 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:749

2017-08-08 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81747 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Yeah, but the condition in which BRANCH_EDGE is called starts with if (EDGE_COUNT (previous_bb_in_path->succs) == 2 so I'm confused now.

[Bug rtl-optimization/81747] [8 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:749

2017-08-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81747 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/81747] [8 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:749

2017-08-08 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81747 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code Tar