https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #33 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Nov 22 16:29:29 2018
New Revision: 266383
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266383=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2018-11-21 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #34 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Nov 22 16:29:50 2018
New Revision: 266384
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266384=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2018-11-21 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 21 20:45:59 2018
New Revision: 266357
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266357=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/85925
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20181120-1.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #31 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It needs some certain bitfield layout, so this is not portable and should
only be run for those targets it is meant for (x86?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #30 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Don't have easy access to arm32 right now to verify if even with
> that change it still FAILs with the combine.c and rtlanal.c change reverted
> and passes with it and if it PASSes on big-endian targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Would:
[...]
> fix this? Don't have easy access to arm32 right now to verify if even with
> that change it still FAILs with the combine.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Would:
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20181120-1.c.jj 2018-11-20
21:39:05.230507352 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20181120-1.c2018-11-21
11:49:29.919488909 +0100
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #27 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #26 from Rainer Orth ---
> (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #25)
>> > The new tests fail at execution on armeb and aarch64_be:
>> > FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #25 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The new tests fail at execution on armeb and aarch64_be:
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20181120-1.c -O0 execution test
>
> So, maybe not fixed yet?
Or maybe the test isn't supposed to pass on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 20 09:04:12 2018
New Revision: 266304
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266304=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-20 Eric Botcazou
PR rtl-optimization/85925
* rtl.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 20 09:03:03 2018
New Revision: 266303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266303=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/85925
* rtl.h (word_register_operation_p):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 20 08:59:30 2018
New Revision: 266302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266302=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/85925
* rtl.h (word_register_operation_p):
15 matches
Mail list logo