https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267
--- Comment #7 from otcmaf ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to otcmaf from comment #4)
> > Do you mean that those pattern above are also wrong pattern ?
>
> YES those are broken.
Ok, thanks very much.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267
zhongyunde at tom dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhongyunde at tom dot com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to otcmaf from comment #4)
> Do you mean that those pattern above are also wrong pattern ?
YES those are broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267
--- Comment #4 from otcmaf ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> The internals documentation documents this even, read:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/RTL-Template.html#index-match_005fdup
>
> From that:
> Note that match_du
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267
--- Comment #2 from otcmaf ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I think this is a back-end issue.
> Can you provide the definition of movtv8hf16 ?
> I don't think you can do:
> (set (match_operand 0 predicate constraint)
> (u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
