https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59454
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Yuri Gribov from comment #5)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > I'm pasting here Jakub's opinion which I agree with:
> >
> > ```
> > I'm strongly against the blacklist, that is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59454
--- Comment #5 from Yuri Gribov ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> I'm pasting here Jakub's opinion which I agree with:
>
> ```
> I'm strongly against the blacklist, that is not the way things are done in
> GCC, you have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59454
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59454
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59454
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59454
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Gribov tetra2005 at gmail dot com ---
Proper link to Fortran attr bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41209
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59454
Yuri Gribov tetra2005 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tetra2005 at
