https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #13 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Tue May 12 07:02:09 2015
New Revision: 223032
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223032root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-12 Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
Geoff Nixon geoff at geoff dot codes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geoff at geoff dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #15 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to Thierry Reding from comment #14)
Thanks Yury.
Np, you are welcome.
@Harald: could you close the bug if it works for you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #17 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to Geoff Nixon from comment #16)
what I should use to patch against the release?
Or is there a different set of changes
specific to the 5.1 branch backport?
For 5.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #14 from Thierry Reding thierry.reding at gmail dot com ---
Thanks Yury.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #18 from Geoff Nixon geoff at geoff dot codes ---
Ok thanks, for other idiots like myself who can't seem to figure out how to get
viewvc to generate a diff for a specific rev, a -p1 patch is:
svn diff -c 223032
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #11 from Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #10)
Did libsanitizer build for you both with and without xdr.h? If yes, I'll
just go ahead and submit this.
I'm using your patch applied
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #12 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
I'm using your patch applied to 5.1.0 without issues on my system without
xdr.h.
That's probably ok, thanks. I'll submit on Monday then (to be online if
problems arise).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #10 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
Did libsanitizer build for you both with and without xdr.h? If yes, I'll just
go ahead and submit this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
Thierry Reding thierry.reding at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #7 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Mon Apr 13 08:59:55 2015
New Revision: 222043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222043root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-13 Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Please consider backporting it to gcc-5-branch, but at this point only after
5.1 is released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #4 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
Finally fixed upstream in
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/compiler-rt/commit/d09b23010698144d10cba0dacc5c599f230cbf62
. Does anyone have time to backport to GCC 5?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y.gribov at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
--- Comment #1 from Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl ---
FWIW, libsanitizer builds just fine if the rpc references are forcibly removed,
like so:
--- a/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc
+++
16 matches
Mail list logo
