https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
I created PR80116 to track the warning addition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Mar 20 13:31:28 2017
New Revision: 246278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246278=gcc=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/80063
* asan.c (DEF_SANITIZER_BUILTIN): Use do { }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As for the warning, we should open an enhancement request, though not sure it
is something for -Wmisleading-indentation. I'd say that we just should warn
whenever a macro defines several statements and the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Please reformat it properly:
#define DEF_SANITIZER_BUILTIN(ENUM, NAME, TYPE, ATTRS) \
do { \
decl = add_builtin_function ("__builtin_" NAME,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Guess we should
--- a/gcc/asan.c
+++ b/gcc/asan.c
@@ -2566,11 +2566,12 @@ initialize_sanitizer_builtins (void)
#undef DEF_BUILTIN_STUB
#define DEF_BUILTIN_STUB(ENUM, NAME)
#undef DEF_SANITIZER_BUILTIN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80063
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
