[Bug target/105136] [11/12 regression] Missed optimization regression with 32-bit adds and shifts

2022-04-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105136 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.3|11.4 --- Comment #5 from Richard

[Bug target/105136] [11/12 regression] Missed optimization regression with 32-bit adds and shifts

2022-04-20 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105136 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- I am just saying trivial things here that RA is a NP-complete task and there is no optimal solution for all tests. For GCC it is even more complicated as RA solves code selection tasks too. Basically

[Bug target/105136] [11/12 regression] Missed optimization regression with 32-bit adds and shifts

2022-04-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105136 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/105136] [11/12 regression] Missed optimization regression with 32-bit adds and shifts

2022-04-04 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105136 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- The regression in bar: is due to RA regression for: (insn 28 27 29 2 (parallel [ (set (reg:SI 89) (plus:SI (reg:SI 92) (subreg:SI (reg:DI 87) 0)))

[Bug target/105136] [11/12 regression] Missed optimization regression with 32-bit adds and shifts

2022-04-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105136 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3 Priority|P3