[Bug target/105587] [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (error: unrecognizable insn) since r13-210-gfcda0efccad41eba

2022-09-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška  ---
Yes.

[Bug target/105587] [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (error: unrecognizable insn) since r13-210-gfcda0efccad41eba

2022-09-13 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587

Arseny Solokha  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||asolokha at gmx dot com

--- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha  ---
Should this PR be closed now?

[Bug target/105587] [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (error: unrecognizable insn) since r13-210-gfcda0efccad41eba

2022-05-18 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587

Sergei Trofimovich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich  ---
Noticed the same ICE on stv-av1-1.0.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69c4b5c519f0df37e4903992644cc29682721bc1 did fix it for
me.

[Bug target/105587] [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (error: unrecognizable insn) since r13-210-gfcda0efccad41eba

2022-05-15 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587

--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu  ---
Fixed in GCC13.

[Bug target/105587] [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (error: unrecognizable insn) since r13-210-gfcda0efccad41eba

2022-05-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69c4b5c519f0df37e4903992644cc29682721bc1

commit r13-468-g69c4b5c519f0df37e4903992644cc29682721bc1
Author: liuhongt 
Date:   Fri May 13 15:48:01 2022 +0800

Fix ICE caused by wrong condition.

When d->perm[i] == d->perm[i-1] + 1 and d->perm[i] == nelt, it's not
continuous. It should fail if there's more than 2 continuous areas.

gcc/ChangeLog:

PR target/105587
* config/i386/i386-expand.cc
(expand_vec_perm_pslldq_psrldq_por): Fail when (d->perm[i] ==
d->perm[i-1] + 1) && d->perm[i] == nelt && start != -1.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* gcc.target/i386/pr105587.c: New test.

[Bug target/105587] [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (error: unrecognizable insn) since r13-210-gfcda0efccad41eba

2022-05-13 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587

--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu  ---
Mine, I'm testing a patch.

[Bug target/105587] [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (error: unrecognizable insn) since r13-210-gfcda0efccad41eba

2022-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1

[Bug target/105587] [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (error: unrecognizable insn) since r13-210-gfcda0efccad41eba

2022-05-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
   Target Milestone|--- |13.0
  Component|tree-optimization   |target