https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Haochen Jiang :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf3695691f4fc964a3b1c8274a6949d844e3edff
commit r13-1570-gbf3695691f4fc964a3b1c8274a6949d844e3edff
Author: Haochen Jiang
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
--- Comment #9 from Haochen Jiang ---
(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #8)
> Created attachment 53269 [details]
> This patch aims to handle memory issue when unpacking in cvtps2pd (version 2)
>
> Just fully tested on this patch. Changed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
--- Comment #8 from Haochen Jiang ---
Created attachment 53269
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53269=edit
This patch aims to handle memory issue when unpacking in cvtps2pd (version 2)
Just fully tested on this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
--- Comment #7 from Haochen Jiang ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6)
> Comment on attachment 53261 [details]
> This patch aims to handle memory issue when unpacking in cvtps2pd
>
> >@@ -9270,7 +9270,15 @@
> > (vec_select:V2SF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Comment on attachment 53261
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53261
This patch aims to handle memory issue when unpacking in cvtps2pd
>@@ -9270,7 +9270,15 @@
> (vec_select:V2SF
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
--- Comment #4 from Haochen Jiang ---
Created attachment 53261
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53261=edit
This patch aims to handle memory issue when unpacking in cvtps2pd
I am trying to solve this ICE problem with this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That doesn't really matter, many instructions just use the g, q etc. modifiers
so that the correct Intel syntax is written, the RTL can have larger MEM just
fine, the only thing that is wrong is e.g. if the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
Hongyu Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] ICE in |[13 Regression] ICE in
13 matches
Mail list logo