https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
--- Comment #9 from Benji Smith ---
Yes, updated to the latest trunk (dac73e4c64bf62be18bd5203e4e0f3e6bc64b4dc) and
confirmed that it no longer repros. Thanks for the fix!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed for trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:887f903ab05ddcac498247384734efbc6cf45147
commit r12-9686-g887f903ab05ddcac498247384734efbc6cf45147
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e01a590aa719d235811c1549547f736de2b5190
commit r13-7430-g5e01a590aa719d235811c1549547f736de2b5190
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07b86ab138bf8be8cb331015cd2b9775c6856ac6
commit r14-1640-g07b86ab138bf8be8cb331015cd2b9775c6856ac6
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dac73e4c64bf62be18bd5203e4e0f3e6bc64b4dc
commit r14-1641-gdac73e4c64bf62be18bd5203e4e0f3e6bc64b4dc
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64 |x86_64-*-*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> So we should be using ABSU_EXPR instead of ABS for _mm_abs_epi8 I think ...
>
> That will fix the issue.
Yes, ABSU_EXPR + VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR.
And also I notice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
No, there is code which ABS on a signed integer does not overflow (that
includes on vector of signed integers) so `ABS<0` is always considered true.
This is where ABSU_EXPR comes into play which does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-06-03
Ever confirmed|0
11 matches
Mail list logo
