https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
fwiw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
--- Comment #15 from Sam James ---
Roger, is this one ready to backport to releases/gcc-13 so we can pick it up
easily downstream via the branch snapshots, or do you want to let it bake on
trunk a bit longer? Cheers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:529909f9e92dd3b0ed0383f45a44d2b5f8a58958
commit r14-3012-g529909f9e92dd3b0ed0383f45a44d2b5f8a58958
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:790c1f60a5662b16eb19eb4b81922995863c7571
commit r14-2939-g790c1f60a5662b16eb19eb4b81922995863c7571
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #12 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> Created attachment 55623 [details]
> x86_64 testcase
>
> Here is a x86_64 testcase which shows the issue is not just with i686 but
> also with int128 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55623
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55623=edit
x86_64 testcase
Here is a x86_64 testcase which shows the issue is not just with i686 but also
with int128 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> Created attachment 55622 [details]
> Reduced C testcase
>
> This reduces the previous testcase and forces the overlap ...
Oh and changed it to be able to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55620|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
When this is split:
(insn 12 11 18 2 (set (reg:DI 0 ax [87])
(rotate:DI (mem:DI (plus:SI (mult:SI (reg:SI 0 ax [orig:89 x0 ] [89])
(const_int 8 [0x8]))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55621
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55621=edit
almost reduced all the way
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55620
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55620=edit
semi-reduced testcase
Here is a reduced testcase which also fails on the trunk.
15 matches
Mail list logo
