[Bug target/112599] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl1024b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Patrick O'Neill --- Closing my old tracking issues.
[Bug target/112599] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl1024b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56795|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #8 from Patrick O'Neill --- Created attachment 56856 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56856=edit rv64gcv_zvl1024b testsuite failures 2023-12-10 Tested with hash fbfe43daec6443978df65530dc5f7f3f8a4e6f9e CI run: https://github.com/patrick-rivos/gcc-postcommit-ci/actions/runs/7158896306 ! New issue found with strided_store_run-2.c testcase - seems to timeout when compiling. Comparison with zvl128b (pr112583): Resolved failures (present on zvl128b but not zvl1024b): XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++14 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++20 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" FAIL: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027 (test for warnings, line 72) FAIL: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027 (test for warnings, line 77) FAIL: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027 note (test for warnings, line 68) XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 285;" XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-not slp2 "from scalars" XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c scan-tree-dump-not slp2 "from scalars" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-cond-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "loop vectorized" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-cond-1.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "loop vectorized" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr65935.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times slp1 "optimized: basic block" 11 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr65935.c scan-tree-dump-times slp1 "optimized: basic block" 11 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "optimized: basic block" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "optimized: basic block" 1 XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "optimized: basic block" 2 XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-3.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "optimized: basic block" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr66251.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr66251.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 2 New failures (present on zvl1024b but not zvl128b): FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_1.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_12.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_12.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr83232.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times slp1 "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 3 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.*r.avlprop, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions comparison FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.*r.reload, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions comparison FAIL: gcc.dg/no-strict-overflow-6.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 0" FAIL: gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c scan-rtl-dump loop2_unroll "Expanding Accumulator" FAIL: gcc.dg/pr53265.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "PHI
[Bug target/112599] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl1024b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56701|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #7 from Patrick O'Neill --- Created attachment 56795 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56795=edit rv64gcv_zvl1024b testsuite failures 2023-12-03 Tested with hash 806789e6daa39ab0503d91c71b3faeb5d5cdd317 CI run: https://github.com/patrick-rivos/gcc-postcommit-ci/actions/runs/7077949347 Comparison with zvl128b (pr112583): Resolved failures (present on zvl128b but not zvl1024b): XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++14 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++20 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 285;" New failures (present on zvl1024b but not zvl128b): FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_1.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_12.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_12.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/no-strict-overflow-6.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 0" FAIL: gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c scan-rtl-dump loop2_unroll "Expanding Accumulator" FAIL: gcc.dg/pr53265.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "PHI i" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr58955-2.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-3.c scan-ipa-dump-times profile "Read tp_first_run: 0" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-3.c scan-ipa-dump-times profile "Read tp_first_run: 2" 1 FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/strided_store_run-2.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/strided_store_run-2.c (test for excess errors) New failures: FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr112552.c -O3 -ftree-vectorize (test for excess errors) This new failure is also seen on pr112583 - looks like a simple issue.
[Bug target/112599] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl1024b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56662|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #6 from Patrick O'Neill --- Created attachment 56701 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56701=edit rv64gcv_zvl1024b testsuite failures 2023-11-25 Tested with hash 9866c98e1015d98b8fc346d7cf73a0070cce5f69 CI run: https://github.com/patrick-rivos/gcc-postcommit-ci/actions/runs/6988591247 Comparison with zvl128b (pr112583): Resolved failures (present on zvl128b but not zvl1024b): XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++14 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++20 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 285;" New failures (present on zvl1024b but not zvl128b): FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_1.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_3.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_3.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_4.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_4.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_4.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_4.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_3.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_3.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_4.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_4.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_4.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_4.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_12.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_12.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/no-strict-overflow-6.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 0" FAIL: gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c scan-rtl-dump loop2_unroll "Expanding Accumulator" FAIL: gcc.dg/pr53265.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr58955-2.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "PHI
[Bug target/112599] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl1024b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec84a1e7a18f65858a1b129ff80cb32e64cf151b commit r14-5851-gec84a1e7a18f65858a1b129ff80cb32e64cf151b Author: Juzhe-Zhong Date: Sun Nov 26 17:13:55 2023 +0800 RISC-V: Disable AVL propagation of slidedown instructions Re-check again RVV ISA, I find that we can't allow AVL propagation not only for vrgather, but also slidedown instructions. Committed. PR target/112599 gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/riscv-avlprop.cc (avl_can_be_propagated_p): Add slidedown. (vlmax_ta_p): Ditto. (pass_avlprop::get_vlmax_ta_preferred_avl): Ditto. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/vf_avl-1.c: Adapt test. * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr112599-3.c: New test.
[Bug target/112599] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl1024b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d83013b88b74d1f1f774d94ca950d3b6dba26e5d
commit r14-5812-gd83013b88b74d1f1f774d94ca950d3b6dba26e5d
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Fri Nov 24 07:18:00 2023 +0800
RISC-V: Optimize a special case of VLA SLP
When working on fixing bugs of zvl1024b. I notice a special VLA SLP case
can be better optimized.
v = vec_perm (op1, op2, { nunits - 1, nunits, nunits + 1, ... })
Before this patch, we are using genriec approach (vrgather):
vid
vadd.vx
vrgather
vmsgeu
vrgather
With this patch, we use vec_extract + slide1up:
scalar = vec_extract (last element of op1)
v = slide1up (op2, scalar)
Tested on zvl128b/zvl256b/zvl512b/zvl1024b of both RV32 and RV64 no
regression.
Ok for trunk ?
PR target/112599
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv-v.cc (shuffle_extract_and_slide1up_patterns):
New function.
(expand_vec_perm_const_1): Add new optimization.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr112599-2.c: New test.
[Bug target/112599] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl1024b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35a688f434159a923420310860c5bc721e29a741
commit r14-5777-g35a688f434159a923420310860c5bc721e29a741
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Thu Nov 23 19:59:52 2023 +0800
RISC-V: Disable AVL propagation of vrgather instruction
This patch fixes following FAILs in zvl1024b of both RV32/RV64:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990128-1.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990128-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin
-flto-partition=none execution test
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990128-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects execution test
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990128-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990128-1.c -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr58955-2.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test
The root case can be simpliy described in this following small case:
https://godbolt.org/z/7GaxbEGzG
typedef int64_t v1024b __attribute__ ((vector_size (128)));
void foo (void *out, void *in, int64_t a, int64_t b)
{
v1024b v = {a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a};
v1024b v2 = {b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b};
v1024b index = *(v1024b*)in;
v1024b v3 = __builtin_shuffle (v, v2, index);
__riscv_vse64_v_i64m1 (out, (vint64m1_t)v3, 10);
}
Incorrect ASM:
foo:
li a5,31
vsetivlizero,10,e64,m1,ta,mu
vmv.v.x v2,a5
vl1re64.v v1,0(a1)
vmv.v.x v4,a2
vand.vv v1,v1,v2
vmv.v.x v3,a3
vmsgeu.vi v0,v1,16
vrgather.vv v2,v4,v1 --> AVL = VLMAX according to codes.
vadd.vi v1,v1,-16
vrgather.vv v2,v3,v1,v0.t --> AVL = VLMAX according to codes.
vse64.v v2,0(a0) --> AVL = 10 according to codes.
ret
For vrgather dest, source, index instruction, when index may has the value
> the following store AVL
that is index value > 10. In this situation, the codes above will end up
with:
The source vector of vrgather has undefined value on index >= AVL (which is
10 in this case).
So disable AVL propagation for vrgather instruction.
PR target/112599
PR target/112670
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv-avlprop.cc (alv_can_be_propagated_p): New
function.
(vlmax_ta_p): Disable vrgather AVL propagation.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr112599-1.c: New test.
[Bug target/112599] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl1024b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56626|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #2 from Patrick O'Neill --- Created attachment 56662 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56662=edit rv64gcv_zvl1024b testsuite failures 2023-11-21 Tested with hash 30d8188e6d1b450533ab0055b951ebfc75022219 Comparison with zvl128b (pr112583): Resolved failures (present on zvl128b but not zvl1024b): XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++14 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++20 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump optimized "return 15;" XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 285;" FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/gather_load_run-12.c execution test FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/gather_load_run-12.c execution test FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/gather_load_run-12.c execution test FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/gather_load_run-12.c execution test FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/gather_load_run-12.c execution test FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/gather_load_run-12.c execution test New failures (present on zvl1024b but not zvl128b): FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_1.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_3.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_3.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_4.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_4.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_4.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxval_char_4.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_3.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_3.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_4.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_4.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_4.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error: in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.cc:8025) FAIL: gfortran.dg/minval_char_4.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_12.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_12.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990128-1.c -O2 execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990128-1.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990128-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects
[Bug target/112599] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl1024b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599 --- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill --- Related issues: 128: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 256: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112597 512: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598 1024: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599
