https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113600

            Bug ID: 113600
           Summary: 525.x264_r run-time regresses by 8% with PGO -Ofast
                    -march=znver4
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
            Blocks: 26163
  Target Milestone: ---
              Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
            Target: x86_64-linux-gnu

With profile-feedback, -Ofast and -march=native on an AMD Zen 4, there is a
recent 8% regression:
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=979.377.0&plot.1=966.377.0&;

With both PGO and LTO, the situation is similar (6%):
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=977.377.0&plot.1=958.377.0&;

On a Zen3 machine, there is a 2% bump around the same time:
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=900.377.0&plot.1=473.377.0&;

I have bisected the (non-LTO) Zen 4 case to commit r14-5603-g2b59e2b4dff421:

2b59e2b4dff42118fe3a505f07b9a6aa4cf53bdf is the first bad commit
commit 2b59e2b4dff42118fe3a505f07b9a6aa4cf53bdf
Author: liuhongt <hongtao....@intel.com>
Date:   Thu Nov 16 18:38:39 2023 +0800

    Support reduc_{plus,xor,and,ior}_scal_m for vector integer mode.

    BB vectorizer relies on the backend support of
    .REDUC_{PLUS,IOR,XOR,AND} to vectorize reduction.

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            PR target/112325
            * config/i386/sse.md (reduc_<code>_scal_<mode>): New expander.
            (REDUC_ANY_LOGIC_MODE): New iterator.
            (REDUC_PLUS_MODE): Extend to VxHI/SI/DImode.
            (REDUC_SSE_PLUS_MODE): Ditto.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * gcc.target/i386/pr112325-1.c: New test.
            * gcc.target/i386/pr112325-2.c: New test.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
[Bug 26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

Reply via email to