https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114487
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
Ah, wait, no point with andrew's nicer testcase ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114487
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
I'm going to upload the originals in case it offers more insight because the
return type isn't mismatched there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114487
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> > Created attachment 57823 [details]
> > testcase for non-lto
> >
> > `-W -Wall -m32 -fwhole-program -march=i686
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114487
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> Created attachment 57823 [details]
> testcase for non-lto
>
> `-W -Wall -m32 -fwhole-program -march=i686 -O1` is enough
Note the only difference between this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114487
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 57823
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57823=edit
testcase for non-lto
`-W -Wall -m32 -fwhole-program -march=i686 -O1` is enough
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114487
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
(You're right, by the way. The original fails with older GCC too. Sorry!)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114487
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
I'd say ix86_function_sseregparm should be decided at a specific point and
recorded for later use. Alternatively there needs to be a (target) IPA
phase where we can mark functions we cannot turn into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114487
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> > Adding -msse to the second compilation works OK, removing -mfpmath=sse from
> > the first compilation also works OK.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114487
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> Adding -msse to the second compilation works OK, removing -mfpmath=sse from
> the first compilation also works OK.
Which makes this PR a LTO reincarnation of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114487
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> (insn 6 5 0 (set (reg/v:SF 99 [ gamma ])
> (reg:SF 20 xmm0)) "testautomation-testautomation_pixels.i":15:17 -1
> (nil))
>
> I'm not sure what's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] ICE when|ICE when building libsdl2
12 matches
Mail list logo
