--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-09 16:50
---
This patch creates regressions on i?86:
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020523-1.c (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gcc.dg/20020523-1.c compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020523-2.c (test for excess
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-03-22 08:42
---
3.4 patch, backported from mainline:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg02057.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-22
15:54 ---
Subject: Bug 14981
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 15:53:59
Modified files:
gcc:
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-03-22 16:00
---
Fixed also on 3.4 branch, finally.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-03-21 13:40
---
The original testcase from description fails again with GNU C version 3.4.4
20050321 (prerelease) (i686-pc-linux-gnu). It compiles OK with mainline.
PR 19010 compiles OK with both compilers.
Reopened as 3.4
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-05
09:30 ---
The fix for PR rtl-opt/15289 has been reverted on the 3.4 branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14981
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03
10:18 ---
Richard backported his fix for PR15289 (mentioned in comment #20)
to the 3.4 branch. This also fixed the problem when compiling
the testcase in comment #18 with -msse.
The problem compiling the testcase
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03
11:50 ---
The regression was introduced by Geoff's patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-01/msg00195.html
(before the 3.4 branch)
This was fixed on mainline by Jan's patch
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-02
09:49 ---
Richard's patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-12/msg00026.html
fixed the problem on mainline, so that all the problems mentioned in
this PR seem to be fixed on mainline.
We still have the 3.4
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-12-02 10:30
---
*** Bug 18779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-30 15:59
---
gcc version 4.0.0 20041130 (experimental) does not ICE in any testcase, so this
is not a 4.0 regression.
--
What|Removed |Added
11 matches
Mail list logo