[Bug target/24669] Loop index variable has offset of 1

--- Comment #7 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-08-28 10:04 --- This is fixed in current mainline, gcc version 4.3.0 20070827 produces: foo: pushl %ebx movl8(%esp), %ebx xorl%edx, %edx movl12(%esp), %ecx .p2align 4,,7

[Bug target/24669] Loop index variable has offset of 1

--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-08-28 10:08 --- FIxed by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg00354.html -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/24669] Loop index variable has offset of 1

--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-01-15 08:46 --- (In reply to comment #2) The fact that the index variable is chosen to start with 1 instead of zero is more interesting. It does not really matter that much, since both possibilities have exactly the same cost. But

[Bug target/24669] Loop index variable has offset of 1

--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-20 13:25 --- (In reply to comment #3) Following patch to ix86_address_cost: this patch causes the PR29124. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24669

[Bug target/24669] Loop index variable has offset of 1

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-25 02:17 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added