--- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:31
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 15:36
---
It appears that HJ's patches are now checked in. Can we close this PR?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26885
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 14:27 ---
Subject: Bug 26885
Author: hjl
Date: Tue May 16 14:27:18 2006
New Revision: 113824
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113824
Log:
gcc/
2006-05-16 H.J. Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR driver/26885
--- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-16 16:32 ---
Hi Mark,
I realized that I had an updated patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00090.html
to address a concern from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00050.html
Can I update gcc/doc/invoke.texi?
--- Comment #11 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-05-16 16:51 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] -m64 -m32 no longer creates
32-bit object
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-16 16:32 ---
Hi Mark,
I realized that I had
--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 17:06 ---
Subject: Bug 26885
Author: hjl
Date: Tue May 16 17:06:05 2006
New Revision: 113828
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113828
Log:
gcc/
2006-05-16 H.J. Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR driver/26885
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 17:29
---
Grrr, this broke bootstrap every where. Did you test this at all? -fno-common
added done by defualt to prevent cases like this.
-- Pinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26885
--- Comment #14 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-16 17:37 ---
I didn't see -fno-common in my build logs on Linux/x86, Linux/x86-64
and Linux/ia64. I am using:
../configure \
\
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld \
\
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 17:39
---
(In reply to comment #14)
--enable-checking=assert \
There is your issue. Why are you disabling all checking except for assert on
the mainline for testing?
--
--- Comment #16 from bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de 2006-05-16 21:30 ---
I saw the fallout of this on the mailing list, but was the patch ever sent to
gcc-patches before it was committed?
--
bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 21:46
---
Yes, the patch was posted; see Comment #8.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26885
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 05:52
---
This version of HJ's patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg01013.html
is OK for mainline and 4.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26885
--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-04-22 15:33 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stage1-gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -c -g -v /tmp/x.s -gstabs -gdwarf-2
Reading specs from ./specs
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/configure
--enable-clocale=gnu
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 02:24 ---
There is a patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00857.html
But I feel it is the wrong approach in that the driver now needs to know about
the options which is semi wrong. There must be an
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-22 00:43 ---
*** Bug 27253 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-04-22 01:16
---
Lets try this. (just a test).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26885
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26885
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 02:52
---
Jakub --
Sorry about introducing this bug! I'm not sure how best to handle it, but I'll
fix it somehow, if you like. I won't have time to work on it for about a week,
but I'll be happy to handle it then. If
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 08:20 ---
On x86-64 Linux? -m32 -m64 works just fine, for cc1 obviously (-m64 wins)
and for gas as well (--32 --64 is passed, the last one wins).
The reason why -m64 -m32 doesn't work is that for cc1 -m32 wins and for
gas we
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-27 16:37 ---
Confirmed, -m32 -m64 is also broken too.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
21 matches
Mail list logo
