--- Comment #3 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-05-02 23:34 ---
I am not seeing this failure in my recent builds, should I go ahead and close
this defect?
--
sje at cup dot hp dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2006-05-03 00:12 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] gcc.dg/20021014-1.c (test
for excess errors) fails
On Tue, 2 May 2006, sje at cup dot hp dot com wrote:
I am not seeing this failure in my recent builds, should I go ahead and
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-03 00:44 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 16:54 ---
A typo shatic' was introduced into the LIB_SPEC.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27034
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 18:32 ---
Subject: Bug 27034
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Apr 9 18:32:16 2006
New Revision: 112807
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112807
Log:
PR target/27034
PR target/26508
*
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
