[Bug target/27883] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips

2006-08-27 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #14 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-27 13:20 --- Bootstrapped and regtested successfully on mipsel-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27883

[Bug target/27883] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips

2006-08-25 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #12 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-25 19:05 --- Update: mzero6.c fails because of this ICE too. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27883

[Bug target/27883] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips

2006-08-25 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #13 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-25 20:09 --- Reduced testcase: double copysign (double x, double y); double GetDouble(); double a = copysign (1.0, GetDouble()); -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27883

[Bug target/27883] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips

2006-08-23 Thread tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 18:56 --- (In reply to comment #9) Jim, were you going to check this in or did you need some more testing on it? I haven't had time to test it yet. Any update on this, Jim? --

[Bug target/27883] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips

2006-08-23 Thread wilson at specifix dot com
--- Comment #11 from wilson at specifix dot com 2006-08-23 21:25 --- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: Any update on this, Jim? No. My life continues to be busy and complicated, making it

[Bug target/27883] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips

2006-07-24 Thread wilson at tuliptree dot org
--- Comment #9 from wilson at tuliptree dot org 2006-07-24 19:34 --- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 14:14, echristo at apple dot com wrote: --- Comment #7 from echristo at apple dot com

[Bug target/27883] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips

2006-07-22 Thread echristo at apple dot com
--- Comment #7 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-07-22 21:14 --- Jim, were you going to check this in or did you need some more testing on it? -- echristo at apple dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/27883] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips

2006-07-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-22 22:07 --- This bug does not belong in waiting as it is not waiting on the user input but a developer input. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/27883] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips

2006-07-10 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-11 01:32 --- This is already fixed on dataflow-branch. At the end of combine_instructions, it runs a global dataflow pass that removes all REG_DEAD and REG_UNUSED notes before creating new ones. --

[Bug target/27883] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips

2006-07-10 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-11 01:41 --- Created an attachment (id=11857) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11857action=view) Delete old REG_DEAD notes before creating new ones. This works for the testcase, but is otherwise untested. This

[Bug target/27883] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips

2006-06-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Known to fail||4.0.0