--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-03-02 17:45 ---
*** Bug 31028 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31019
--- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-03-02 14:51 ---
Patch committed, with somehow smaller code-size saves as per
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00122.html.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-02 12:27 ---
Subject: Bug 31019
Author: uros
Date: Fri Mar 2 12:26:55 2007
New Revision: 122473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122473
Log:
PR target/31019
* config/i386/i386.h (TUNEMASK): Re
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-03-02 11:03 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00115.html
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-03-02 10:12 ---
Mine, I have a patch in testing.
And this is _definitelly_ not a microoptimization. I'll post the patch shortly
to gcc-patches, please look at some suprising numbers below...
size cc1
textdata bss dec
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-02 09:42 ---
I count 5 and one such use in i386.c.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31019
