[Bug target/31801] [dataflow] undefined reference to `gen_blockage'

2007-06-24 Thread mstein at phenix dot rootshell dot be
--- Comment #5 from mstein at phenix dot rootshell dot be 2007-06-24 12:10 --- Was fixed some weeks ago. -- mstein at phenix dot rootshell dot be changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/31801] [dataflow] undefined reference to `gen_blockage'

2007-05-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-03 19:24 --- This is all target issues, they should be including a pattern for blockage. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/31801] [dataflow] undefined reference to `gen_blockage'

2007-05-03 Thread dj at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from dj at redhat dot com 2007-05-03 20:01 --- Note that only 19 out of 33 target directories (trunk) even mention the word blockage and there's no mention of blockage in the trunk documentation. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31801

[Bug target/31801] [dataflow] undefined reference to `gen_blockage'

2007-05-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-03 22:00 --- (In reply to comment #2) there's no mention of blockage in the trunk documentation. HUH? @cindex @code{blockage} instruction pattern @item @samp{blockage} This pattern defines a pseudo insn that prevents the

[Bug target/31801] [dataflow] undefined reference to `gen_blockage'

2007-05-03 Thread dj at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 from dj at redhat dot com 2007-05-03 22:55 --- Gak, the grep didn't show it earlier today, but does now. Sigh. Lesson: never buy quantum computers! We still have the problem that almost half the targets (on trunk) don't have gen_blockage(). Will updating all the